| The first excerpt represents the past or something you must release, and is drawn from Sons of the Soil by Honore de Balzac: accidentally, Courtecuisse, the only keeper then employed at Les
Aigues, the great extent of which really needed at least three.
"Well, Monsieur Gaubertin," said Courtecuisse, "so you have had
trouble with the count?"
"Who told you that?" answered Gaubertin. "Well, yes; the general
expected to order us about as he did his cavalry; he didn't know
Burgundians. The count is not satisfied with my services, and as I am
not satisfied with his ways, we have dismissed each other, almost with
fisticuffs, for he raged like a whirlwind. Take care of yourself,
Courtecuisse! Ah! my dear fellow, I expected to give you a better
master."
|
The second excerpt represents the present or the deciding factor of the moment, and is drawn from Juana by Honore de Balzac: in the depths of their souls, Juana would not cast down her husband's
joy,--a double role, dreadful to play, but to which, sooner or later,
all women unhappily married come. This is a history impossible to
recount in its full truth. Juana, struggling hourly against her
nature, a nature both Spanish and Italian, having dried up the source
of her tears by dint of weeping, was a human type, destined to
represent woman's misery in its utmost expression, namely, sorrow
undyingly active; the description of which would need such minute
observations that to persons eager for dramatic emotions they would
seem insipid. This analysis, in which every wife would find some one
of her own sufferings, would require a volume to express them all; a
|
The third excerpt represents the future or something you must embrace, and is drawn from Myths and Myth-Makers by John Fiske: furnished by the books themselves, and not because these books
could not have been preserved by oral tradition. Is there,
then, in the Homeric poems any such internal evidence of dual
or plural origin as is furnished by the interlaced Elohistic
and Jehovistic documents of the Pentateuch? A careful
investigation will show that there is not. Any scholar who has
given some attention to the subject can readily distinguish
the Elohistic from the Jehovistic portions of the Pentateuch;
and, save in the case of a few sporadic verses, most Biblical
critics coincide in the separation which they make between the
two. But the attempts which have been made to break up the
 Myths and Myth-Makers |